Meta Quest 3S v/s Quest 3: Which is Best for VR Cricket?

After immersing ourselves in over three months of gameplay with both the Meta Quest 3 and the Meta Quest 3S, we’re here to guide you through choosing the ideal headset for your VR cricket experience. 

Each device boasts unique strengths and weaknesses, and understanding these nuances will help you make an informed decision.

So, let’s jump in and find out which VR headset is the most suitable for playing VR cricket games like Final Overs. 

Key Takeaways

• Display Technology: Quest 3 features advanced pancake lenses; Quest 3S utilizes traditional Fresnel lenses.

• Field of View (FOV): Quest 3 offers a wider FOV, enhancing immersion.

• Interpupillary Distance (IPD) Adjustment: Quest 3 provides continuous IPD adjustment; Quest 3S has fixed settings.

• Comfort and Design: Quest 3 is slimmer but slightly heavier; Quest 3S is more affordable.

• Price Point: Quest 3S is more budget-friendly, with some trade-offs.

• Battery Life: Quest 3S offers a longer battery life despite a smaller battery capacity.

• Sound Quality: Quest 3S delivers more bass; Quest 3 provides clearer audio.

Time to break them down in detail!

Display Technology

The Meta Quest 3 is equipped with innovative pancake lenses, which are thinner and offer a crisper image compared to the Quest 3S’s Fresnel lenses. 

This advancement means that with the Quest 3, visuals remain sharp across your entire field of view, eliminating the need to align your eyes precisely to achieve clarity—a common requirement with Fresnel lenses.

Field of View (FOV)

When it comes to FOV, the Quest 3 holds a significant advantage. 

It provides a 110° horizontal and 96° vertical view, whereas the Quest 3S is limited to 96° horizontally and 90° vertically. 

This broader FOV in the Quest 3 enhances immersion, making you feel more integrated into the virtual cricket environment.

You Might Also Be Intereted In: Meta Quest 2 vs Meta Quest 3: Which Offers the Incredible VR Experience

Interpupillary Distance (IPD) Adjustment

The Quest 3 offers a smooth IPD adjustment range between 53mm and 75mm, allowing for precise customization to match various eye distances. 

In contrast, the Quest 3S provides three fixed IPD settings: 58mm, 63mm, and 68mm. 

This flexibility in the Quest 3 ensures a more comfortable and clear viewing experience for a wider range of users.

Comfort and Design

Design-wise, the Quest 3 is slimmer, contributing to better weight distribution, though it is approximately 24 grams heavier than the Quest 3S. 

Despite the slight increase in weight, the improved distribution in the Quest 3 makes it feel less cumbersome during extended play sessions. 

Additionally, the Quest 3 includes a headphone jack, a feature absent in the Quest 3S, offering more audio options for an immersive cricket experience.

Price Point

Affordability is where the Quest 3S shines. Starting at just $299 for the 128GB model and $399 for the 256GB version, it is $200 cheaper than the Quest 3. 

However, it’s important to note that the lower price comes with certain compromises, such as the use of Fresnel lenses and a narrower FOV.

Battery Life

Interestingly, the Quest 3S, despite having a smaller 4324 mAh battery, offers a longer runtime of approximately 2.5 hours. 

The Quest 3, with a larger 5060 mAh battery, provides around 2.2 hours of usage. 

This difference is likely due to the higher-resolution display and advanced features in the Quest 3 consuming more power.

Sound Quality

Audio experiences differ between the two headsets. Some users repo rt that the Quest 3S’s speakers deliver more bass, while others prefer the clearer sound profile of the Quest 3. 

Your preference may vary depending on whether you prioritize deeper bass tones or overall clarity during your VR cricket matches.

Must Read: Top 12 Must-Play VR Games for 2025: Your Guide to the Best Virtual Reality Adventures

Final Verdict: Which One Should You Buy?

So, is the Quest 3 worth the extra $200 for your VR cricket endeavors? 

Generally, yes, especially if you value superior display quality, a wider field of view, and enhanced comfort. 

The improved optics and design contribute to a more immersive and enjoyable cricket experience.

However, if you’re new to VR or on a tighter budget, the Quest 3S offers a compelling entry point. 

It provides solid performance and access to the same library of VR cricket games, allowing you to enjoy the sport without a significant financial investment.

In summary, if you’re a dedicated VR cricket player seeking the best experience, the Quest 3’s enhancements are worth the investment. 

Conversely, if you’re exploring VR cricket for the first time or purchasing for younger users, the Quest 3S presents a cost-effective and capable alternative.

For the latest prices and potential discounts, especially during sales events, be sure to check reputable retailers. 

If you own either headset, we’d love to hear your thoughts.

Do you find them enhancing your VR cricket experience? Let us know in the comments below!